RFK, Jr. turns his attention to another vital health advisory group

RFK, Jr. turns his attention to another vital health advisory group

RFK, Jr. turns his attention to another vital health advisory group

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is an independent group that offers advice on what health exams and medications health insurance should cover.

By Adam Kovac edited by Claire Cameron

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. appears before the Senate Finance Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building September 4, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. appears before the Senate Finance Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building September 4, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

After reshuffling a key government vaccine advisory committee to include vaccination skeptics, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr. is reportedly preparing to appoint new members to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), an independent group that guides recommendations for preventive services such as cancer screening and helps determine insurance coverage.

Kennedy pledged to remake the group to a Appearance at the Capitol in April, telling a Senate committee that the panel was “reckless and negligent.” Kennedy said his department has already started receiving applications for new members and will look to add doctors from specialties that he said have been underrepresented in the past, such as oncologists and anesthesiologists.

The USPSTF typically meets three times a year, but has been on hiatus since March 2025. Kennedy fired USPSTF leaders, Tufts Medical Center physician John Wong and University of Maryland professor Esa Davis, in May of this year. The Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement to Scientific American that the group’s next meeting, scheduled for July, would take place in August “to allow more time for the selection and integration of new members of the working group.”


On supporting science journalism

If you enjoy this article, please consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribe. By purchasing a subscription, you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kennedy skepticism of accepted medical practicessuch as vaccinations, and the promotion of unproven substances such as peptideshas raised concerns among some experts about his efforts to reform the USPMTF.

Adam Carroll, president and CEO of AcademyHealth, a health policy nonprofit, said: Policy that it is possible that Kennedy appointees could promote policies that are “no longer evidence-based or scientific.” Kennedy said the USPSTF could require insurance companies to cover more preventive health checks at no extra cost to consumers, but those checks could be “things that might not be evidence-based or could potentially cause more harm than good,” Carroll said.

When asked for comment, the American Medical Association (AMA) cited Scientific American to two previous statements. In the first, published in July 2025, the AMA expressed “deep concern” over reports that Kennedy planned to replace all members of the USPSTF, saying it played a “critical, nonpartisan role” in guiding doctors’ efforts to prevent disease.

In the other statement, released after Wong and Davis’ firings, the AMA urged Kennedy to “restore the USPSTF’s long-standing and transparent process for selecting members, particularly clinicians with expertise in the areas of preventative medicine and primary care.”

“We also implore HHS to commit to once again holding regular task force meetings to ensure its important work can continue without further delay. Our patients’ lives depend on it.”

Editor’s Note (07/08): This is a developing story and may be updated.

It’s time to defend science

If you enjoyed this article, I would like to ask for your support. Scientific American has been defending science and industry for 180 years, and we are currently experiencing perhaps the most critical moment in these two centuries of history.

I was a Scientific American subscriber since the age of 12, and it helped shape the way I see the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of respect for our vast and magnificent universe. I hope this is the case for you too.

If you subscribe to Scientific Americanyou help ensure our coverage centers on meaningful research and discoveries; that we have the resources to account for decisions that threaten laboratories across the United States; and that we support budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In exchange, you receive essential information, captivating podcastsbrilliant infographics, newsletters not to be missedunmissable videos, stimulating gamesand the best writings and reports from the scientific world. You can even give someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you will support us in this mission.

Exit mobile version