crime

Public employment is no leisurely obligation, it is position of responsibility: Karnataka High Court

Public employment is no leisurely obligation, it is position of responsibility: Karnataka High Court

‘Protective umbrella of maternity benefits is intended to shield motherhood from the rigours of employment; it is not intended to immunise an employee from the discipline that employment necessarily demands’

At a time when countless qualified aspirants strive for the scarce opportunity of securing public employment, an employee who has been fortunate enough to secure such an opportunity cannot treat the employment with studied indifference, the High Court of Karnataka has remarked.

The court also said that “an appointment to public service cannot be regarded as a privilege to be enjoyed at convenience and an obligation to be discharged at leisure. A public employment is not merely a source of livelihood but it is a position of responsibility, carrying with it corresponding obligations of diligence, discipline and devotion to duty. The security that public employment affords is accompanied by the responsibility that public service demands.”

Justice M. Nagaprasanna made these observations while upholding the administrative decision of the High Court in discharging a 36-year-old probationary software technician for unauthorised absence after she was granted 169 days of extraordinary leave after she exhausted 180 days maternity leave and 35 days of earned leave. She had not reported back to duty claiming that no one is there to take care of her child at home as her husband too is employed.

The petitioner cannot seek to take shelter under the benevolent canopy of maternity protection for conduct that commenced after the exhaustion of maternity leave and continued even after the expiry of all other leave sanctioned to her, the court said while observing that “the protective umbrella of maternity benefits is intended to shield motherhood from the rigours of employment; it is not intended to immunise an employee from the discipline that employment necessarily demands.”

Stating that maternity leave is a right that the law zealously protects, and not a concession that the employer grudgingly extends, the court said that a right, however sacrosanct, cannot be stretched beyond its legitimate contours to become an inexhaustible charter for unauthorised absence.

  • employment
  • obligation
  • position
  • responsibility
  • karnataka
  • high
  • court
  • umbrella

Summaries and tags are generated automatically. Stay informed with VidiaNews.

Related news

High Court dismisses Brian Yongo’s petition seeking removal of Nairobi CECM Charles Kerich
crime

High Court dismisses Brian Yongo’s petition seeking removal of Nairobi CECM Charles Kerich

NAIROBI, Kenya Nov 12 – The High Court has dismissed a petition seeking to remove Nairobi County Executive Committee Member (CECM) for Mobility Charles Kerich from office over alleged gross misconduct arising from his previous conviction for contempt of court. Yongo had argued that Kerich was unfit to continue holding public office following a High Court finding that he was in contempt of court on October 14, 2025, over failure to settle a legal fees debt owed to Kwengu and Company Advocates.

Read →
High Court to hear fresh case challenging Linda Mwananchi name change; sets Nov 16th hearing
crime

High Court to hear fresh case challenging Linda Mwananchi name change; sets Nov 16th hearing

NAIROBI, Kenya, Nov 13 – The High Court has declined to suspend the Linda Mwananchi Movement’s National Delegates Conference (NDC), even as it certified as urgent a fresh application seeking to overturn a tribunal decision that allowed the meeting to proceed. The latest court challenge comes after the PPDT dismissed a separate petition seeking to block the Linda Mwananchi Movement’s NDC, allowing the party to proceed with its planned meeting.

Read →