Indicted judge who sits in judgement can only deliver injustice, by Owei Lakemfa
Ten weeks before the contentious and increasingly violent general elections in the country, Justice Peter Odo Lifu of the Federal High Court Abuja nullified the leadership of one of the two main opposition parties, the African Democratic Congress, ADC. This slow nature of justice or the judiciary, is what has enabled Lifu to return and practically pass the same judgement over which the Court of Appeal has sat; the purported removal of the Mark-Aregbesola leadership, the nullification of the party’s candidates and, other party decisions submitted to the Independent Electoral Commission, INEC.
Ten weeks before the contentious and increasingly violent general elections in the country, Justice Peter Odo Lifu of the Federal High Court Abuja nullified the leadership of one of the two main opposition parties, the African Democratic Congress, ADC. He did not only purport to remove the David Mark-Rauf Aregbesola leadership of the party, but also nullified the nomination of all the party’s candidates in the elections.
This includes that of its Presidential candidate, former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar. The Lifu judgement was made a day after the party launched its presidential campaigns in Sokoto. On the day of the judgement, the ADC Presidential train had moved to Kebbi State where it was attacked by thugs. This attack was not surprising. In fact, the Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC Presidential train of Peter Obi holds the record of suffering the most attacks in the country.
In broad day light with cameras rolling, it has been attacked by thugs in Edo, Benue, Cross Rivers, and most recently, Delta State. The most recent attack on the African Action Congress, AAC Presidential team was perhaps the most graphic and documented. It was an attack in a restaurant in Ado Ekiti carried out by clearly identifiable criminals captured in various video recordings and CCTV camera.
The ruling All Progressives Congress, APC has also recorded attacks. An APC campaign convoy headed for a rally in Funtua, Katsina State was attacked on the Yashi-Funtua road resulting in fourteen arrests. In the same state, two APC supporters were reportedly killed in Yankara while heading for a pro-Governor Dikko Radda rally. In Zaria, Kaduna State, APC campaign vehicles were reportedly attacked in September, 2026.
Woven into this rising political violence are the continued attacks by terrorists and bandits across the country. All these are ominous signs of what 2027 might hold for the country, only for Justice Lifu, a judge indicted on Tuesday, June 16, 2026 by the Court of Appeal, to return to his judicial rascality and, attempt on Thursday, November 5, 2026 to set the political system on fire.
Lifu had on June 15, 2026 deregistered the ADC and four other political parties. What irked the Appeal Court was that twenty four days earlier, it had ordered a stay of proceedings in the suit and, this had been brought to the attention of Lifu in open court. But the High Court judge willfully decided to override the decision of the higher court and, in fact, sat on appeal over it.
It seemed nothing mattered to Lifu including the facts of the case before him. Clearly, whatever gains he hoped to get, outweighed the consequences he thought he could suffer by his judicial recklessness. A clearly angry Court of Appeal, reversed Lifu’s judgment describing it as a: “brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution”.
It declared Lifu as being unfit to be a judge and that his actions are: “the highest form of judicial impertinence (and) judicial rascality” Many weighed in to protect the integrity of the judiciary and save the country from avoidable anarchy. In my June 22, 2026 column titled ‘Anarchism in judicial robes’ I submitted that: “Justice Lifu should take a bow from the bench and save the institution further embarrassment.
But if he does not, the judiciary should show him the exit.” But over four months later, neither has happened and Lifu continues to roll on; a loose canon in the judicial system. This slow nature of justice or the judiciary, is what has enabled Lifu to return and practically pass the same judgement over which the Court of Appeal has sat; the purported removal of the Mark-Aregbesola leadership, the nullification of the party’s candidates and, other party decisions submitted to the Independent Electoral Commission, INEC.
Lifu in his latest judgement, sat on appeal in the July 2, 2026 judgement of Justice Musa S. Liman equally of the Federal High Court, Abuja. In his Judgement in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1637/2025 instituted by Hon. Leke Abejide, Justice Liman affirmed the legitimacy of the Mark-Aregbesola leadership. He specifically ruled that the July 2, 2025 handover of the ADC to the Mark-Aregbesola leadership and, the follow up July 29, 2025 NEC meeting which formally handed over the party leadership, was legal and, in compliance with the ADC constitution and the Electoral Act.
Justice Liman further ruled that the matter of party leadership is an internal affair of the party and, that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. He directed INEC to recognize the Mark-Aregbesola leadership. The INEC complied with the judgement. So, when four months later, Lifu assumed jurisdiction to hear the leadership case and, ruled that the handover was, contrary to Justice Liman’s judgement, unconstitutional, he was actually sitting on appeal over the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction.
The judiciary may not be blamed for producing Lifu as a judge or failing to rein him in after the Court of Appea
- judgement
- lifu
- court
- judge
- party
- attack
- appeal
- country





