Kanye West’s wife’s style criticized by potential juror in mansion trial

Potential jurors in Kanye West’The ongoing Malibu mansion lawsuit is well aware of his wife’s style of dress and has expressed his disapproval.

West is married to Bianca Censoriwho has become known in recent years for his bold and often provocative style, even in public appearances.

Jurors also reportedly took issue with West’s behavior on social media, and he and Censori expected to testify as the case progressed.

Juror Calls Bianca Censori’s Grammy Outfit ‘Disgusting’

During a jury selection hearing for Kanye West’s $57 million Malibu trial against a construction worker, things got a little personal when they were asked if they “had formed an opinion” about the rapper and his wife, Bianca Censori.

According to the New York Post, the majority of those proposed raised their hands to affirm that this was the case, and for Censori, those opinions seemed to focus on his fashion choices.

On several occasions, Censori has appeared in public wearing various risky outfits, some even going so far as to expose her private parts.

On last year’s Grammys red carpet, she pushed the boundaries even further by dressing near-naked in a completely sheer, form-fitting dress, which she initially covered with a long, fluffy black coat.

The attire was specifically mentioned by Juror #37, who called it “disgusting.”

“I saw it on Facebook,” the person said. “I don’t know if she’s his wife? I didn’t like the way she presented herself. I don’t want to look at her. It’s disgusting!” she said, before adding that she could still remain impartial during the trial.

The rapper was criticized for his social media antics

As for West, some jurors pointed out that they had issues with his social media antics, which had already earned him negative traction over the years.

A retired teacher, who ranks 45th in the ranking, even revealed that his low opinion of West was shared by those close to him.

“I don’t like what he supports. Those close to me are very opposed to this guy,” the juror said.

Another juror, a computer specialist, pointed out that he had read his comments on Reddit, which had “negatively modified” his opinion of the rapper.

Another juror, a woman, referenced West’s rants against Jewish people, saying that not only did she not like what he said about them, but that the rapper also had a poor understanding of how to approach such issues.

“He simplifies things. This guy doesn’t analyze things well,” the individual said.

Everything About Kanye West’s $57 Million Malibu Mansion Deal

For that case, West is being sued by Tony Saxon, a construction worker who worked on the rapper’s $57 million Malibu Mansion renovation years ago.

Originally designed by star architect Tadao Ando for financier Richard Sachs, the 4,000 square foot home was purchased by Kanye West in 2021 for $57.25 million during his divorce from Kim Kardashian. The rapper has since sold it to Bellwood Investment for less than half of what he paid.

Now, according to court documents, Saxon claims West withheld his wages and subjected him to unsafe working conditions during the renovation. He also alleges he was wrongfully fired by the rapper.

Saxon is asking the court for more than $1 million in damages and is expected to testify at trial, alongside West and Censori.

The rapper’s lawyer refuted Tony Saxon’s claims about the payment during his opening statement

Opening statements in the Malibu mansion case were delivered Tuesday by attorneys representing both sides.

West’s attorney, Andrew Cherkasky, forcefully denied Saxon’s allegations regarding the payment, according to rolling stone.

He claimed that Saxon had been well paid for the six weeks of work on the “architectural gem” and that although he had been hired for “preparatory work for the renovation”, he had instead “destroyed the Ando house”.

Kanye West’s lawyer accused alleged victim of setting ‘an impossible standard’ for himself

West’s attorney also rejected Saxon’s claim that he was forced to live in the building during the renovation, insisting the decision was entirely up to him.

“It was Saxon who set an impossible standard for himself. He wanted to work 24/7. He wanted to camp near the house. He wanted to be the one in charge,” Cherkasky told jurors.

The lawyer continued: “You might say he was shocked to learn there were no toilets there. …No one asked [Saxon] to stay there, certainly not for the night. »