Just before 8 a.m. one day last April, an office manager named Amani sent a motivational message to his colleagues and subordinates. “Every day brings a new opportunity: a chance to connect, inspire and make a difference,” he wrote in his 500-word message to an office-wide WhatsApp group. “Talk to the next customer like you’re bringing them something valuable, because you are. »
Amani didn’t put together a typical sales team. He and his subordinates worked in a “pig slaughter” complex, a criminal operation constructed to carry out scams—a promising romance and riches of crypto investments – that often scam victims out of hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars at a time.

Read the full story from WIRED source Mohammad Muzahir, here.
The workers Amani was speaking to had been on a 15-hour night shift since eight a.m. at a high-rise building in the Golden Triangle special economic zone in northern Laos. Like their victims, most of them were also victims: forced laborers trapped in the compound, in debt bondage and without passports. They struggled to meet fraudulent revenue quotas to avoid fines that added to their debt. Anyone who breaks the rules or tries to escape faces far worse consequences: beatings, torture, or even death.
The strange reality of daily life in a Southeast Asian fraud complex — the tactics, the tone, the mixture of cruelty and optimistic corporate chatter — is revealed at an unprecedented level of resolution in leaked documents to WIRED from a whistleblower within such a sprawling fraud operation. The facility, known as the Boshang Complex, is one of dozens of fraudulent operations across Southeast Asia that have enslaved hundreds of thousands of people. Often lured from poorer parts of Asia and Africa with fake job offers, these conscripts have become the driving forces behind the world’s most lucrative form of cybercrime, forced to steal tens of billions of dollars.
Last June, one of these forced laborers, an Indian man named Mohammad Muzahir, contacted WIRED while he was still a captive inside the fraud complex that had trapped him. Over the following weeks, Muzahir, who initially identified himself only as “Red Bull,” shared a wealth of information about the fraudulent operation with WIRED. Its leaks included internal documents, fraudulent scripts, training guides, operational flowcharts, and photographs and videos from inside the complex.
Of all Muzahir’s leaks, the most revealing is a collection of screen recordings in which he sifted through three months of internal WhatsApp group chats at the resort. These videos, which WIRED converted into 4,200 pages of screenshots, capture hour-by-hour conversations between workers at the complex and their bosses, as well as the nightmarish work culture of a hog butchering organization.
“It’s a slave colony trying to pass itself off as a business,” says Erin West, a former prosecutor in Santa Clara County, Calif., who runs an anti-scam organization called Operation Shamrock and who reviewed the chat logs obtained by WIRED. Another researcher who examined the leaked chat logs, Jacob Sims of Harvard University’s Asia Center, also noted their “Orwellian veneer of legitimacy.”
“It’s terrifying, because it’s manipulation And coercion,” says Sims, who studies scam compounds in Southeast Asia. “The combination of those two things motivates people the most. And this is one of the main reasons why these compounds are so profitable.
In another chat message, sent hours after Amani’s saccharine pep talk, a higher-level boss chimed in: “Don’t resist company rules and regulations,” he wrote. “Otherwise you can’t survive here.” Staff members responded with 26 emoji reactions, all thumbs-up and greetings.

Whistleblower Mohammad Muzahir, photographed in India after returning from his ordeal as a forced laborer in the Golden Triangle.
Photography: Saumya Khandelwal
Fined for slavery
In total, according to According to WIRED’s analysis of the group chat, more than 30 employees at the resort managed to defraud at least one victim during the 11 weeks of available recording, totaling approximately $2.2 million in stolen funds. Yet bosses in the chat often expressed disappointment with the group’s performance, berated staff for their lack of effort and issued fine after fine.
Rather than explicit imprisonment, the complex relied on a system of indentured servitude and debt to control its workers. As Muzahir described it, he received a base salary of 3,500 Chinese yuan per month (about $500), which in theory meant 75 hours per week of night work, including breaks to eat. Although his passport was taken away, he was told that if he could clear his “contract” with a payment of $5,400, it would be returned to him and he would be allowed to leave.
In fact, WhatsApp chats reveal that even this meager salary was almost completely wiped out by fines. A message warns that anyone who fails to start a “first conversation” – an introductory conversation with a scam victim – on any given day will be fined 50 yuan and the failure will be announced to the group. Filing a false progress report carries a fine of 1,000 yuan. Falling asleep in the office, or “watching unrelated videos, chatting with friends and any activities that are not work-related” are each punishable by a 200 yuan fine, as is any “disturbance” in the dormitory, where workers sleep five or six to a room in bunk beds.
One post reported a fine of 500 yuan for a worker who slept late, and another 200 yuan for not being in the dormitory at “check-in time” after their shift. Resist a fine by failing to sign a form acknowledging the misconduct, and the fine is doubled.
Muzahir himself described being fined so much that he was virtually broke. Food in the office cafeteria was also frequently denied as punishment, the posts showed, with worker ID badges granting access to the canteen sometimes removed for seven days for small infractions like being late. Even the freedom to bring snacks and drinks – other than betel nuts, a stimulant – could be taken away if staff don’t perform well. Holidays have also been eliminated, with staff sometimes forced to work seven evenings a week, Muzahir says.
Yet these penalties could be avoided, bosses often promised, if they succeeded in scamming someone—or “opening a customer,” as bosses euphemistically described scamming a new victim. (Scamming the same victim multiple times was called a “recharge.”) In theory, workers were entitled to a commission, in addition to their pay, for any scam they pulled off. Muzahir says he managed to pull off two scams during his months in the compound – both of which left him wracked with regret, he says – and was never paid after either one.
Bosses nevertheless used workers’ illusory hope of repaying their debt – or even returning home rich – as a means of motivation. “I get it: When penalties or fines are imposed on you, it’s easy to feel discouraged. But I urge you to see this not as a punishment, but as a lesson and an investment in your own growth,” Amani wrote. “Don’t fear the fine. Let it fuel your fire.”
The most senior boss, whose name was Da Hai, explained the carrot and stick approach more clearly. “The company’s incentives are much higher than the fines, so as long as you work hard to attract new customers, you will receive a generous reward! he wrote.
One of the bosses’ tactics was to pit teams against each other, berating underperforming workers while highlighting the success of other crooks in the compound. Every room in the office appears to have been equipped with a ceremonial Chinese drum, played when an employee successfully scammed a victim out of a six-figure sum. “Do you know why the next office beats the drum? »wrote a higher-level boss named Alang.
A victim had paid “480,000”, replies a boss named Libo.
“It doesn’t matter, because it belongs to others,” Alang responds. “The important thing is which one of you can play the drum?”

A Chinese ceremonial drum stands in the office, ready to be struck when workers pull off scams worth a hundred thousand dollars or more.Photography: Mohammad Muzahir
Under pretext, a brutal reality
Beyond these manipulators tactics, the messages sometimes offer a glimpse of a much harsher reality – as does the personal experience and testimony of Muzahir himself. Muzahir says he has heard stories of people being tortured and says he himself was threatened by Amani with beatings and electrocution if he did not find new “clients”. Sometimes colleagues disappeared without explanation.
Eventually, Muzahir came up with a plan to trick his captors into letting him go. When the bosses found out, he was detained in a room, beaten, slapped and kicked, deprived of food and water, and forced to drink a solution containing a dissolved white powder, which appears to have been intended to make him more cooperative during their interrogation.
Occasional messages in chat logs suggest that these cruel punishments were hidden beneath the resort’s motivational messages. At one point, Boss Alang mentions a girl who “ran away from the company and went to work in a brothel”, and another person in the group mentions that “the company” still has her passport. Among the captive workers, Muzahir says, it was rumored that the girl had actually been sold into prostitution, a practice documented in other accounts from scam survivors.
At another point, while berating the group for their underperformance, boss Da Hai alludes to the large sum of money the workers had to produce if they ever hoped to leave the compound. “You continue to violate company policies,” he wrote to the group. “If you continue like this, prepare your compensation and get out of here.”
Such references to paying “compensation” for release are They’re actually “code words for ransom and debt bondage,” says Harvard’s Sims. The nation of Laos, Sims points out, is a signatory to the Palermo Protocol, which classifies as a victim of human trafficking anyone who is in debt and forced to work without freedom of movement. “There is no gray area here.”
A day in the life of a crook
The leaked WhatsApp the discussions include a message from a boss named Terry, setting a strict work schedule for the people under his supervision. “Obey and respect working hours,” the message says. Each team started around 11:30 p.m. Beijing time – 10:30 p.m. in Laos – and people had to arrive a few minutes early. Before the end of the day, at 2 p.m. Beijing time, there were two break periods, one of which was reserved for meals. At 5 p.m., everyone had to return to their dormitories and “sleep or remain silent, without disturbing others.” If the rules were not followed, fines would be issued and identity badges could be withdrawn.
The reason for this nighttime schedule was to synchronize with the waking hours of the victims in the United States, almost entirely Indian-American men. (It is a common practice to pair fraudsters with victims of their own ethnicity, to avoid language and cultural barriers.)
Unlike their real lives, all staff members were required to post an imaginary daily schedule for their fake personas – the rich, attractive women they pretended to be during scams. Hour by hour, they describe mornings spent meditating, practicing yoga, going for walks, and “setting positive intentions” for the day. Other activities included a “relaxed” lunch with their team, dinner with loved ones, and time at the gym, when in reality they were spending entire nights in front of a screen in a neon-lit office.
Many staff members writing the schedules were nevertheless reprimanded for not sticking to the script during their scams. “The point of editing “A Daily Plan is to make it clear to everyone what you are going to share with your clients today when you start work,” one boss complained. “I find a lot of people are just doing it to get the job done and not implementing your plan for their clients.”
During their workday, the forced swindlers were also required, under penalty of additional fines, to report their attempted scams in detail to the bosses. WhatsApp logs are filled with long messages from each team member who offer these reports in identical message templates, listing their “team”, name and recent online activity with the fake profiles. They would list how many active social media accounts they operated, whether any of their accounts had been suspended, how many chats they had started, how many were ongoing, any successful scams, and their target for the month. The internal chats also show scammers sharing screenshots of their chats with their victims on Facebook Messenger, Instagram, Snapchat and other chat apps with their bosses and colleagues, while asking questions about potential victims.
Bosses frequently gave specific feedback on how workers handled the meta-narrative of their scams. “When sharing travel topics, you need to know how to share details,” says one discussion. Another post from a boss urges workers not to mention the car their character drives if they can’t provide a convincing photo of it.
Managers would keep a close eye on the activity. On several occasions, bosses ask forced workers to connect their WhatsApp accounts to managers’ computers so that they can monitor the conversations themselves.
Anatomy of a scam
The 25 scenarios and the guides Muzahir shared with WIRED also offer a window into the tactics and training of workers at the complex. Many guidance documents cover the essentials of cryptocurrency investment scams, including how to form a friendship that can lead to an investment proposal, how to explain what cryptocurrency is, and what to do once a target agrees to make an investment.
One document lists “100 talking points,” intended to create the emotional intimacy necessary for a romance scam (“What was your dream when you were little?” “When was the last time I cried?”). Another suggests providing an update on a car accident. “While on my way to work in the morning, my car was hit by a following car at a red light, almost delaying my morning appointment. Thank you for your concern. I’m fine.”
Several documents trick scammers into claiming they are currently making an investment, then introduce the idea that banks are reluctant to let customers convert their money into cryptocurrency. “If we transfer or withdraw funds, they will have one less customer,” a proposed scam script says. “If everyone does this, then the bank will be in crisis and there will be a capital crunch situation. I can understand their motivations, but as a customer of the bank, I should not be prevented from transferring assets in a reasonable and legal manner. That’s what makes me angry.”
The documents also show a technique which, according to researchers is often used in investment and romance scams in Southeast Asia: attackers intentionally mention the concept of scams (even directly evoking the threat of investment scams) as a way to inoculate themselves against suspicion. The idea is that if a person is willing to talk openly about scams and doesn’t avoid the topic or act strange about it, they can’t be a scammer themselves.
This strategy goes so far as to include mentally preparing a victim for anti-fraud warnings from their bank or even law enforcement that they may have to ignore in order to transfer large amounts of fiat currency into cryptocurrency. “I was going to transfer funds to my coinbase today, but was deliberately delayed and obstructed by bank staff,” one script read, referring to the popular crypto wallet service Coinbase. “I also received an anti-fraud call from the FBI today, which wasted a lot of time.”
The documents provided by Muzahir from the Boshang complex also document key role generative AI tools play into its deceptions. Muzahir described to WIRED how workers at the complex are trained to use tools like ChatGPT and Deepseek to come up with responses during discussions with victims and create natural-sounding turns of phrase. But even more crucial is the resort’s use of deepfake AI software to allow scammers to convincingly video chat with victims at their request using an AI-generated face, posing as a person whose photos they stole for a fake persona.
Internal chat logs captured by Muzahir describe a dedicated “AI room” where a female mannequin makes face-swapping calls on demand with an endless parade of victims. A WhatsApp message from a boss on the group chat says “Sana (our model who helps us call) is not available this evening. She is not feeling well. Therefore, do not promise your clients to call them. Maybe she will come to work in the morning. Plan your work accordingly.[g]ment.
Other discussions in the AI room concern scheduling challenges given the demand for face-swap calls and the fact that a single model can only make one deepfake call at a time. One conversation, for example, notes: “If there is a ‘busy’ sign on their door, change it to ‘free’ when you go out, to avoid crowds and frequent door openings.”
The scripts shared by Muzahir also include tips for delaying a video chat with a victim, perhaps until the scammer is ready to use deepfake tools. “When we meet, it won’t be awkward, but rather we will look forward to it,” says a script on what to say when a victim asks to video chat. He continues: “We are strengthening our relationship every day. You have also seen my photos. When we meet, can you recognize me?”
Beyond the Golden Triangle
As dystopian as Although the Golden Triangle complex described in the leaked documents is, its working environment appears to have been relatively lax compared to other complexes in countries like Cambodia or Myanmar. At these facilities, Erin West of Operation Shamrock says she’s heard stories of workers beaten simply because they didn’t meet their quota or forced to work 18-hour shifts on their feet, with no pretense of volunteer work in a corporate environment.
According to Harvard’s Sims, the Muzahir compound’s relative leniency likely stems from a sense of complete control over fraudulent operations in Laos’ Golden Triangle region, an area of the country controlled largely by Chinese business interests and which has become the scene of crimes ranging from narcotics and organ sales to illegal wildlife trafficking. Even human trafficking victims who escape from a compound, Sims points out, can be found relatively easily thanks to the influence of Chinese organized crime on local law enforcement. “These guys don’t need to be held in a cell,” Sims says. “The whole place is a closed circuit.”
Nonetheless, the Boshang compound that held Muzahir appears to have moved in November from the Golden Triangle to Cambodia, a country that has become, in some ways, an even safer base for crooks. Based on messages from his former colleagues, Muzahir says he is determined that the company and its captive workers will now be based in the town of Chrey Thom, which Sims and West both describe as a growing hotspot for fraudulent operations.
This decision may have been precipitated, Sims speculates, by police raids on area resorts around that time. Many of these raids appear to have been part of “performative repression,” as Sims puts it. (One such raid in June targeted the building where Muzahir’s compound was previously located, but Muzahir says the workers who were arrested by police were quickly released and returned to work.)
Nevertheless, the nuisance of these disturbances, even superficial, may have persuaded those responsible for the operation to move to Cambodia. There, even the family of Prime Minister Hun Manet has been linked to a business conglomerate that oversees a subsidiary with documented ties to the booming scam industry. “It’s been a very hospitable environment for doing this work,” West says.
One of Muzahir’s former bosses also confirmed to him in a private text message exchange that the complex is always “recruiting” new workers, victims trapped in a system of modern slavery hidden beneath the thin facade of a voluntary workplace.
“It’s a place to work ller, not to profit,” the same boss had written in a group chat during Muzahir’s stay at the compound, at a rare moment when the mask of a normal office environment seemed to fall. “We can only enjoy life if we leave here.”
Additional reporting by Sophia Takla, Maddy Varner and Zeyi Yang.
Let us know what you think about this article. Send a letter to the editor to mail@wired.com.































