Glean, a company often described as the Google for business, said it has reached $300 million in annual recurring revenue (ARR), three times more than the $100 million milestone reached just 15 months ago.
While many AI startups are growing at a breakneck pace, Glean’s progress is particularly notable. After years of being the sole player in the category, the seven-year-old startup is accelerating its growth as tech giants enter the enterprise AI research market with competing products.
“For the first four or five years of our existence, we had no competition,” Glean CEO Arvind Jain told TechCrunch. “Given the importance of research to make AI work in the enterprise, every company in the world wants to be in this space.”
Tech heavyweights building Glean-like tools include Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic, Salesforce, and Atlassian.
Jain maintains that it is useful to be a pioneer in the field, but it is also equally important to offer a better product.
What Glean does better than its competitors, according to Jain, comes down to its AI tools’ deep understanding of customers’ business needs. Glean’s AI achieves this knowledge — a concept captured by the popular new term “pop-up chart» – by connecting and learning from companies’ internal software systems.
Jain says Glean’s context graph also helps businesses reduce AI IT costs.
“If you connect your AI to Glean, it gives you all the information you need to do your job, making the AI consume far fewer tokens than if you released the AI directly onto your systems,” Jain said. Indeed, with Glean, the AI ends up performing fewer operations, he added.
At a time when many companies are blowing their AI budgets, these token savings have become a major selling point for the company.
“One of the things our customers really like about Glean is the fact that we can significantly reduce your AI bill,” he said.
The company, which was last valued at $7.2 billion when it raised a $150 million Series F last June, offers various pricing structures to its clients, which include Databricks, Reddit, Pinterest and Samsung.
According to Jain, Glean offers both a consumption-based model, in which customers pay as they use it, and a hybrid model that combines a fixed monthly fee for active users with a separate usage fee for the model’s consumption.
Glean is certainly not the first company to do this, but it’s worth pointing out that the company’s $300 million milestone cannot be entirely described as a traditional ARR, because a consumption model, by definition, does not have a strictly recurring component.
Pure consumption pricing models rely on fluctuating user activity rather than predictable subscription renewals. Therefore, part of Glean’s turnover is more accurately described as annualized revenue rate.
Glean did not immediately respond to a request for comment; This post will be updated if the company responds.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This does not affect our editorial independence.
Marina Temkin is a venture capital and startups reporter at TechCrunch. Before joining TechCrunch, she wrote about venture capital for PitchBook and Venture Capital Journal. Earlier in her career, Marina was a financial analyst and earned her CFA designation.
You can contact or check Marina’s outreach by sending an email marina.temkin@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at +1 347-683-3909 on Signal.
