Imagine two members receiving a message from their health plan on the same day. One of them is a 75-year-old Spanish-speaking man who suffers from several chronic illnesses. The other is a 30-year-old pregnant woman going through her first trimester. Their health issues, life stages, cultural background, and communication preferences are worlds apart. Yet, too often, the outreach they receive is remarkably similar.
When awareness fails to recognize these differences, it erodes trust. Members feel invisible, messages don’t seem relevant, and opportunities to intervene quickly are lost. In fact, consumers are much more likely to engage with communications that feel personalized and relevant, whereas generic outreach is more likely to be ignored – this cuts across sectors.
This communication gap around personalization comes at a time when health plans can least afford inefficiency. Margins are tightening, regulatory expectations are increasing, and growth requires precision. In this environment, “doing more with less” isn’t just about reducing expenses: it’s also about making sure every interaction counts. Health plans have invested heavily in engagement platforms, analytics tools, CRMs and portals, but many still struggle to convert these investments into meaningful impact. Health plans have no shortage of technology. They have an orchestration problem and, increasingly, a consolidation imperative.
Why “more” digital hasn’t delivered better results
The increase in the number of digital tools has not yielded better results as fragmentation has diluted its impact. The infrastructure exists, but commitment lags behind. 90% Health systems now offer patient portals to access electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States, but only 15% to 30% of patients use these platforms.
Over the past decade, payers have had tiered engagement platforms, with each solution addressing a specific operational need. However, collectively, these investments have led to fragmentation, with systems operating in silos rather than as part of a coordinated ecosystem. As a result, data often resides in separate environments and departments run campaigns independently, each touching a different part of the member journey without full visibility into the whole.
At the same time, managing a wide range of service partners increases operational expenses, complicates compliance monitoring and increases administrative costs. Additionally, supplier proliferation introduces duplication of effort and fragmented accountability. Given growing financial constraints, payers are increasingly re-evaluating whether splitting capacity across many point solutions actually generates value.
The need for intelligent, results-oriented engagement
As margin pressure intensifies in 2026 and beyond, service partner consolidation accelerates. Plans are moving away from managing sprawling vendor ecosystems and toward working with a smaller group of partners who can provide engagement, analytics and data functions. The rationale is practical: When services are aligned in coordinated relationships, costs go down, operational friction decreases, and accountability improves.
However, consolidation is not just a sourcing strategy. Rather, it’s a data strategy and a member experience strategy. Fragmented partners produce disparate data, and fragmented data inevitably leads to fragmented communication. Therefore, to deliver measurable performance, predictive intelligence and AI must evolve beyond static dashboards and toward operational decision-making. Plans should not simply track gaps in care; rather, they should anticipate them. They should not wait to respond to disengagement; they should intervene before this happens.
A true omnichannel strategy requires the same discipline. It’s not about activating all channels. It’s about getting the right message to the right member, through the right channel, at the right time. This level of accuracy depends on synchronized data between touchpoints. When information is consolidated rather than scattered across providers, communication becomes consistent. The messages align. The timing is improving. Members experience continuity instead of confusion.
Regulated communications and required technology investments must step up efforts
In an environment where cost containment impacts engagement strategies, it is important to make the most of mandatory member touchpoints and committed technology investments. When there is alignment across functions, regulated communications are a powerful tool for driving performance-based initiatives without increasing the volume of awareness. For example, onboarding packets given to returning scheme members should contain embedded CTAs that drive strategic initiatives for the scheme but also add value to the individual. This requires alignment on CTA prioritization and a unified understanding of member-level value drivers.
Portals represent a committed technological investment, but little exploited by plans, because their adoption and use by members is often low. Health plans need to understand how the portal fits into the member journey and how it can provide value as both a communications channel and a site for important member interactions. Typically, members seek call center support as they navigate key points in their member journey when more cost-effective, member-centric solutions can be provided through the member portal. There must be a clear understanding of the ROI associated with better portal performance, which determines the appropriate amount of investment to drive adoption and high member usage of the portal.
Improve quality, efficiency and customization without increasing costs
When data, engagement, and digital experiences work in harmony, plans can focus resources where they have the greatest impact on star ratings, CAHPS, and closing care gaps. At the same time, confidence strengthens when members feel understood – and trust directly influences retention, buy-in and long-term value. In other words, when engagement infrastructure is unified and service partnerships are consolidated, plans unlock benefits across three critical dimensions:
- Stronger performance results, through precise engagement directly linked to quality metrics and measurable impact.
- Greater operational efficiency, achieved through streamlined governance, reduced vendor complexity and simplified internal workflows
- Reduce the total cost of engagement, by consolidating services, reducing duplication and maximizing the value of existing investments
In the current financial context, these gains are not optional. They are strategic. When infrastructure is aligned through unified systems, efficiency and performance reinforce each other.
Smart engagement as a change in business model
Establishing a closed-loop environment to measure and optimize engagement strategies and business performance is becoming a consistent goal among leading health plans. Data must inform decisions in real time, and decisions must shape engagement dynamically, influencing measurable outcomes. A closed-loop strategy cannot work in a fragmented environment. This requires unified data sources, aligned service partners, and coordinated orchestration of engagement within a single strategic framework.
Supplier consolidation is therefore not simply a question of costs. It is an operational necessity. Fragmented partner ecosystems dilute accountability, disperse data, and weaken the member experience. Narrowing the partner landscape to those capable of delivering integrated capabilities creates synchronized communication, stronger governance and clearer ownership of performance.
In an environment characterized by margin pressure and regulatory intensity, intelligent engagement based on unified infrastructure is becoming the defining capability of modern health plans. Those who consolidate, orchestrate and enhance their engagement ecosystem will not just tackle inefficiency: they will solve it. In doing so, they will transform consolidation from a defensive cost measure into a proactive growth strategy.
Photo: Topp_Yimgrimm, Getty Images
Steve Mongeli
Steve MongeliPresident, mPulsejoined Clarity in January 2008 after a decade in the national healthcare and insurance market. His success in developing new products and marketing strategies for member enrollment and retention has been instrumental in bringing Clarity to the industry-leading position it holds today.
Steve was most recently COO at Clarity and led numerous initiatives, including the development of successful print-on-demand programs; streamline marketing communications; develop modern, cost-effective solutions to replace existing inefficient documentation methods; and ultimately create an improved experience for members and customers.
In 2020, he was promoted to President and CEO and now oversees all aspects of Clarity’s business, focusing on continued growth, exceptional customer service and product innovation. Steve holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Richmond.
This message appears via the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can post their views on healthcare business and innovation on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.
































