Supreme Court Arguments on Idaho's Abortion Ban: 5 Takeaways
The abortion case before the Supreme Court on Wednesday gave rise to vigorous questions and comments, notably from the three liberal justices. At issue is whether Idaho's near-total ban on abortion is so strict that it violates a federal law requiring emergency care for any patient, including abortion for pregnant women in dire situations.
A ruling could have repercussions beyond Idaho, to at least a half-dozen other states that have similarly restrictive bans .
The implications of the case could also extend beyond abortion, including whether states can legally restrict other types of medical care emergency and whether federal law opens the door to fetal personhood claims.
Here are some takeaways:
The case addresses the issue whether Idaho's abortion ban violates federal law.Idaho's ban allows abortion to save a pregnant woman's life, but not to prevent his health from deteriorating. The federal government says it therefore violates the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA, which was signed into law nearly 40 years ago.
EMTALA states that when a patient goes to an emergency room with an urgent medical problem, hospitals must either provide treatment to stabilize the patient or transfer the patient to a medical facility that can, regardless of capacity. to pay the patient. He says if a state law conflicts with federal law, federal law takes precedence.
A lawyer representing Idaho, Joshua Turner, said to the Supreme Court that the state does not believe its abortion ban is in conflict with federal law. He said the ban allows emergency services to perform abortions if a pregnant woman has a medical problem that could lead to her death, not just if she is facing imminent death.
We are having difficulty retrieving article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
< p>Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode, please exit and sign in to your Times account, or subscribe to the entire Times.Thank you for your patience while we let's check...
The abortion case before the Supreme Court on Wednesday gave rise to vigorous questions and comments, notably from the three liberal justices. At issue is whether Idaho's near-total ban on abortion is so strict that it violates a federal law requiring emergency care for any patient, including abortion for pregnant women in dire situations.
A ruling could have repercussions beyond Idaho, to at least a half-dozen other states that have similarly restrictive bans .
The implications of the case could also extend beyond abortion, including whether states can legally restrict other types of medical care emergency and whether federal law opens the door to fetal personhood claims.
Here are some takeaways:
The case addresses the issue whether Idaho's abortion ban violates federal law.Idaho's ban allows abortion to save a pregnant woman's life, but not to prevent his health from deteriorating. The federal government says it therefore violates the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA, which was signed into law nearly 40 years ago.
EMTALA states that when a patient goes to an emergency room with an urgent medical problem, hospitals must either provide treatment to stabilize the patient or transfer the patient to a medical facility that can, regardless of capacity. to pay the patient. He says if a state law conflicts with federal law, federal law takes precedence.
A lawyer representing Idaho, Joshua Turner, said to the Supreme Court that the state does not believe its abortion ban is in conflict with federal law. He said the ban allows emergency services to perform abortions if a pregnant woman has a medical problem that could lead to her death, not just if she is facing imminent death.
We are having difficulty retrieving article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
< p>Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode, please exit and sign in to your Times account, or subscribe to the entire Times.Thank you for your patience while we let's check...
What's Your Reaction?
