When did humans begin to accumulate social knowledge?
When did humans begin to accumulate social knowledge?
Enlarge
IURII
BOUKHTA
A
key
appearance
of
humans'
evolutionary
success
East
THE
do
that
We
don't do it
to have
has
learn
how
has
TO DO
things
Since
scratch.
OUR
companies
to have
developed
miscellaneous
ways - of
official
education
has
Youtube
videos - for
to transmit
What
others
to have
learned.
This
makes
learning
how
has
TO DO
things
far
Easier
that
learning
by
TO DO,
And
he
given
We
more
space
has
experience;
We
can
learn
has
build
new
things
Or
handle
Tasks
more
effectively,
SO
pass
information
on
how
has
TO DO
SO
on
has
others.
A few
of
OUR
closer
parents,
as
chimpanzees
And
bonobos,
learn
Since
their
companion
members of the species.
They
don't do it
seem
has
to commit
In
This
iterative
process
of
improvement - they
don't do it,
In
technical
terms,
to have
A
cumulative
culture
Or
new
technologies
are
built
on
pass
awareness.
SO,
When
did
humans
develop
This
capacity?
Base
on
A
new
analysis
of
rock
tool making,
two
researchers
are
argue
that
THE
ability
East
relatively
recent,
dating
has
just
600,000
years
There is.
It is
roughly
THE
even
time
OUR
ancestors
And
THE
Neanderthals
went
their
separated
ways.
Accumulate
culture
It is
pretty
obvious
that
A
plot
of
OUR
technology
built
on
pass
efforts.
If
You are
while reading
This
on
A
mobile
platform,
SO
You are
benefit
Since
THE
do
that
smart phones
were
derivative
Since
staff
computers
And
that
software
required
functioning
material
has
arrive.
But
For
millions
of
years,
human
technology
missing
THE
sort
of
clear
building
blocks
that
would be
help
We
identify
When
A
archaeological
artifact
East
derivative
Since
earlier
work.
SO,
how
TO DO
You
go
about
to study
THE
origin
of
cumulative
cultural?
Jonathan
Paige
And
Charles
Perrault,
THE
researchers
behind
THE
new
study,
took
A
pretty
direct
approach.
HAS
to start
with,
they
concentrate
on
rock
tools
Since
these
are
THE
only
things
that
are
well preserved
through
OUR
species'
history.
In
a lot
case,
THE
fashions
of
tools
stayed
constant
For
hundreds
of
thousands
of
years.
This
given
We
enough
examples
that
We have
has been
able
has
figure
out
how
these
tools
were
made,
In
a lot
case
learning
has
TO DO
them
ourselves.
Their
argument
In
THE
paper
they have
just
published
East
that
THE
sophistication
of
these
tools
provides
A
measure
of
When
cultural
accumulation
begin.
"As
new
prune
techniques
are
discovered,
THE
borders
of
THE
possible
design
space
develop,"
they
argue.
"These
more
complex
technologies
are
Also
more
difficult
has
discover,
master,
And
teach."
THE
question
SO
becomes
A
of
When
humans
do
THE
key
change:
Since
simply
education
THE
following
generation
has
TO DO
THE
even
sort
of
tools
has
using
that
awareness
as
A
foundation
has
build
something
new.
Paige
And
Perreault
argue
that
It is
A
matter
of
how
complex
he
East
has
TO DO
THE
tool:
"Generations
of
improvements,
modifications,
And
lucky
Errors
can
generate
technologies
And
know how
GOOD
beyond
What
A
Single
naive
individual
could
invent
independently
In
their
for life."
Measure
complexity
Their
reasoning
leaves
THE
issue
of
how
has
measure
that
complexity
And
how
has
determine
When
he
crosses
A
threshold
that
A
"Single,
naive
individual"
I could not
develop
on
their
clean.
Paige
And
Perreault
to focus
on
What
they
term
A
"procedural
unit,"
which
they
define
as
"discreet,
mutually
exclusive
manufacturing
not
that
can
be
chained
together."
SO,
THE
more
of procedure
units
he
takes
has
TO DO
A
tool,
THE
more
complex
THE
manufacturing
process
East.
THE
the earlier
rock
tools
only
involve
three
of
THE
33
total
of procedure
units
THE
researchers
identified.
THE
most
sophisticated,
Since
In
THE
pass
10,000
years,
required
19.
SO,
Or
East
THE
cut
that
requires
cumulative
culture?
THE
researchers
to use
A
number
of
examples:
THE
tool making
do
by
OUR
primate
parents,
ask
non qualified
humans
has
TO DO
A
rock
tool,
And
random
flaking
of
rocks.
HAS
most of them,
these
used
six
of procedure
units,
SO
that
was
considered
THE
cut: anything
beyond
six
means
that
cumulative
culture
was
necessary.
Look
has
real
tools,
they
find
three
distinct
periods.
THE
First of all
short
Since
THE
to start
of
tool
manufacturing
about
3.3
million
years
There is
has
roughly
1.8
million
years
There is.
It is
characterized
by
easy to do
tools
that
require
four
of procedure
units
Or
less.
From
1.8
million
YOU...
A
key
appearance
of
humans'
evolutionary
success
East
THE
do
that
We
don't do it
to have
has
learn
how
has
TO DO
things
Since
scratch.
OUR
companies
to have
developed
miscellaneous
ways - of
official
education
has
Youtube
videos - for
to transmit
What
others
to have
learned.
This
makes
learning
how
has
TO DO
things
far
Easier
that
learning
by
TO DO,
And
he
given
We
more
space
has
experience;
We
can
learn
has
build
new
things
Or
handle
Tasks
more
effectively,
SO
pass
information
on
how
has
TO DO
SO
on
has
others.
A few
of
OUR
closer
parents,
as
chimpanzees
And
bonobos,
learn
Since
their
companion
members of the species.
They
don't do it
seem
has
to commit
In
This
iterative
process
of
improvement - they
don't do it,
In
technical
terms,
to have
A
cumulative
culture
Or
new
technologies
are
built
on
pass
awareness.
SO,
When
did
humans
develop
This
capacity?
Base
on
A
new
analysis
of
rock
tool making,
two
researchers
are
argue
that
THE
ability
East
relatively
recent,
dating
has
just
600,000
years
There is.
It is
roughly
THE
even
time
OUR
ancestors
And
THE
Neanderthals
went
their
separated
ways.
Accumulate
culture
It is
pretty
obvious
that
A
plot
of
OUR
technology
built
on
pass
efforts.
If
You are
while reading
This
on
A
mobile
platform,
SO
You are
benefit
Since
THE
do
that
smart phones
were
derivative
Since
staff
computers
And
that
software
required
functioning
material
has
arrive.
But
For
millions
of
years,
human
technology
missing
THE
sort
of
clear
building
blocks
that
would be
help
We
identify
When
A
archaeological
artifact
East
derivative
Since
earlier
work.
SO,
how
TO DO
You
go
about
to study
THE
origin
of
cumulative
cultural?
Jonathan
Paige
And
Charles
Perrault,
THE
researchers
behind
THE
new
study,
took
A
pretty
direct
approach.
HAS
to start
with,
they
concentrate
on
rock
tools
Since
these
are
THE
only
things
that
are
well preserved
through
OUR
species'
history.
In
a lot
case,
THE
fashions
of
tools
stayed
constant
For
hundreds
of
thousands
of
years.
This
given
We
enough
examples
that
We have
has been
able
has
figure
out
how
these
tools
were
made,
In
a lot
case
learning
has
TO DO
them
ourselves.
Their
argument
In
THE
paper
they have
just
published
East
that
THE
sophistication
of
these
tools
provides
A
measure
of
When
cultural
accumulation
begin.
"As
new
prune
techniques
are
discovered,
THE
borders
of
THE
possible
design
space
develop,"
they
argue.
"These
more
complex
technologies
are
Also
more
difficult
has
discover,
master,
And
teach."
THE
question
SO
becomes
A
of
When
humans
do
THE
key
change:
Since
simply
education
THE
following
generation
has
TO DO
THE
even
sort
of
tools
has
using
that
awareness
as
A
foundation
has
build
something
new.
Paige
And
Perreault
argue
that
It is
A
matter
of
how
complex
he
East
has
TO DO
THE
tool:
"Generations
of
improvements,
modifications,
And
lucky
Errors
can
generate
technologies
And
know how
GOOD
beyond
What
A
Single
naive
individual
could
invent
independently
In
their
for life."
Measure
complexity
Their
reasoning
leaves
THE
issue
of
how
has
measure
that
complexity
And
how
has
determine
When
he
crosses
A
threshold
that
A
"Single,
naive
individual"
I could not
develop
on
their
clean.
Paige
And
Perreault
to focus
on
What
they
term
A
"procedural
unit,"
which
they
define
as
"discreet,
mutually
exclusive
manufacturing
not
that
can
be
chained
together."
SO,
THE
more
of procedure
units
he
takes
has
TO DO
A
tool,
THE
more
complex
THE
manufacturing
process
East.
THE
the earlier
rock
tools
only
involve
three
of
THE
33
total
of procedure
units
THE
researchers
identified.
THE
most
sophisticated,
Since
In
THE
pass
10,000
years,
required
19.
SO,
Or
East
THE
cut
that
requires
cumulative
culture?
THE
researchers
to use
A
number
of
examples:
THE
tool making
do
by
OUR
primate
parents,
ask
non qualified
humans
has
TO DO
A
rock
tool,
And
random
flaking
of
rocks.
HAS
most of them,
these
used
six
of procedure
units,
SO
that
was
considered
THE
cut: anything
beyond
six
means
that
cumulative
culture
was
necessary.
Look
has
real
tools,
they
find
three
distinct
periods.
THE
First of all
short
Since
THE
to start
of
tool
manufacturing
about
3.3
million
years
There is
has
roughly
1.8
million
years
There is.
It is
characterized
by
easy to do
tools
that
require
four
of procedure
units
Or
less.
From
1.8
million
YOU...