The Bitcoin ETF False Start: Hack or Thick-Fingered SEC Intern?

THE DRY official X account job that A place Bitcoin ETFs had has been approved, only has claim It is account had has been compromise half A hour later.

The false start of the Bitcoin ETF: hack or big-finger SEC intern?” class= News Join We on social networks

THE question everyone wanna has know RIGHT NOW East: was THE DRY Tweeter earlier Today declaring A Bitcoin ETFs had has been approved THE result of A To hack, Or was he A official message that was accidentally sent Also early?

THE SECOND denied It is staff had any of them participation In assignment THE "unauthorized" Tweeter — However a few In THE crypto community think Otherwise.

On Jan. 9, THE official X (Previously Twitter) account of THE SECOND job that he had granted approvals For Bitcoin AND F has be listed on all registered national securities Exchanges. This turned out has be false, according to has declarations Since SECOND Chair Gary Gensler And THE SECOND.

THE DRY account First of all job A Single Tweeter that read “$BTC.” He was deleted several minutes later, moments Before THE account job THE apparently official announcement that said A Bitcoin ETFs had has been approved.

THE SECOND account published And SO quickly deleted A a word Tweeter that read “$BTC.” Source: X

Cinnaamhain Businesses partner Adam Cochran said This chain of events suggests that while THE SECOND was most likely pirate, THE announcement job I could have Also has been legitimate.

"My guess East that THE SECOND account was both pirate AND that THE Tweeter was real," he wrote In A Jan. 9 X job. "Pirate First of all tweeted And SO deleted just A teleprinter. SO likely find THE Tweeter with THE announcement chart And Gensler quote In THE draft case. »

My guess East that THE SECOND account was both pirate AND that THE Tweeter was real.

Hah...

The Bitcoin ETF False Start: Hack or Thick-Fingered SEC Intern?

THE DRY official X account job that A place Bitcoin ETFs had has been approved, only has claim It is account had has been compromise half A hour later.

The false start of the Bitcoin ETF: hack or big-finger SEC intern?” class= News Join We on social networks

THE question everyone wanna has know RIGHT NOW East: was THE DRY Tweeter earlier Today declaring A Bitcoin ETFs had has been approved THE result of A To hack, Or was he A official message that was accidentally sent Also early?

THE SECOND denied It is staff had any of them participation In assignment THE "unauthorized" Tweeter — However a few In THE crypto community think Otherwise.

On Jan. 9, THE official X (Previously Twitter) account of THE SECOND job that he had granted approvals For Bitcoin AND F has be listed on all registered national securities Exchanges. This turned out has be false, according to has declarations Since SECOND Chair Gary Gensler And THE SECOND.

THE DRY account First of all job A Single Tweeter that read “$BTC.” He was deleted several minutes later, moments Before THE account job THE apparently official announcement that said A Bitcoin ETFs had has been approved.

THE SECOND account published And SO quickly deleted A a word Tweeter that read “$BTC.” Source: X

Cinnaamhain Businesses partner Adam Cochran said This chain of events suggests that while THE SECOND was most likely pirate, THE announcement job I could have Also has been legitimate.

"My guess East that THE SECOND account was both pirate AND that THE Tweeter was real," he wrote In A Jan. 9 X job. "Pirate First of all tweeted And SO deleted just A teleprinter. SO likely find THE Tweeter with THE announcement chart And Gensler quote In THE draft case. »

My guess East that THE SECOND account was both pirate AND that THE Tweeter was real.

Hah...

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow