Multichain's 'Mysterious Withdrawals' Smells of 'Rug Pulling' - Chainalysis
Chainalysis told Cointelegraph that it "describes it as a possible draw" based on an analysis of fake transactions and internal issues of Multichain.
![Multichain's 'Mysterious Withdrawals' Smells of 'Rug Pulling' - Chainalysis](https: // images.cointelegraph.com/images/1434_aHR0cHM6Ly9zMy5jb2ludGVsZWdyYXBoLmNvbS91cGxvYWRzLzIwMjMtMDcvNWI1ODExYjUtM2UwMy00OWI1LWJjZjItYmQzYzE1MmM5NzBmLmpwZw==.jpg)
The multi-million dollar Multichain cross-chain bridge protocol exploit could have been an inside pull, according to blockchain security and analytics firm Chainalysis.
"On July 6, 2023, the Multichain cross-chain bridge protocol suffered unusually large and unauthorized withdrawals in what appears to be a hack or insider sweepstakes," the company wrote. in a July 10 blog post.
The exploit has so far resulted in the loss of over $125 million.
On July 6, @MultichainOrg experienced unusually large and unauthorized withdrawals, resulting in losses of over $125 million. This is one of the biggest #crypto hacks on record.
Read on to find out what we know so far: https://t.co/ib2K6sIrID pic.twitter.com/BBY3iU75oB
— Chainalysis (@chainalysis) July 10, 2023However, Chainalysis believes the exploit may have resulted from compromised admin keys, which some say means it could have been an "internal work".
![](https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2023-07/9a9e8462-ed39-4893-b3d5-9e0893d930f2.jpg)
In a statement to Cointelegraph, a spokesperson for Chainalysis confirmed that the company "describes it as a possible coin toss".
Multichain smart contracts use a Multi-Party Computing (MPC) system, which is similar to a multi-signature wallet, the company explained.
"It is possible that the attacker took control of Multichain's MPC keys in order to achieve this exploit," Chainalysis said, adding:
"Although it is possible that these keys have...
![Multichain's 'Mysterious Withdrawals' Smells of 'Rug Pulling' - Chainalysis](https://images.cointelegraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect,quality=90,width=840/https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2023-07/5b5811b5-3e03-49b5-bcf2-bd3c152c970f.jpg?#)
Chainalysis told Cointelegraph that it "describes it as a possible draw" based on an analysis of fake transactions and internal issues of Multichain.
![Multichain's 'Mysterious Withdrawals' Smells of 'Rug Pulling' - Chainalysis](https: // images.cointelegraph.com/images/1434_aHR0cHM6Ly9zMy5jb2ludGVsZWdyYXBoLmNvbS91cGxvYWRzLzIwMjMtMDcvNWI1ODExYjUtM2UwMy00OWI1LWJjZjItYmQzYzE1MmM5NzBmLmpwZw==.jpg)
The multi-million dollar Multichain cross-chain bridge protocol exploit could have been an inside pull, according to blockchain security and analytics firm Chainalysis.
"On July 6, 2023, the Multichain cross-chain bridge protocol suffered unusually large and unauthorized withdrawals in what appears to be a hack or insider sweepstakes," the company wrote. in a July 10 blog post.
The exploit has so far resulted in the loss of over $125 million.
On July 6, @MultichainOrg experienced unusually large and unauthorized withdrawals, resulting in losses of over $125 million. This is one of the biggest #crypto hacks on record.
Read on to find out what we know so far: https://t.co/ib2K6sIrID pic.twitter.com/BBY3iU75oB
— Chainalysis (@chainalysis) July 10, 2023However, Chainalysis believes the exploit may have resulted from compromised admin keys, which some say means it could have been an "internal work".
![](https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2023-07/9a9e8462-ed39-4893-b3d5-9e0893d930f2.jpg)
In a statement to Cointelegraph, a spokesperson for Chainalysis confirmed that the company "describes it as a possible coin toss".
Multichain smart contracts use a Multi-Party Computing (MPC) system, which is similar to a multi-signature wallet, the company explained.
"It is possible that the attacker took control of Multichain's MPC keys in order to achieve this exploit," Chainalysis said, adding:
"Although it is possible that these keys have...
What's Your Reaction?
![like](https://vidianews.com/assets/img/reactions/like.png)
![dislike](https://vidianews.com/assets/img/reactions/dislike.png)
![love](https://vidianews.com/assets/img/reactions/love.png)
![funny](https://vidianews.com/assets/img/reactions/funny.png)
![angry](https://vidianews.com/assets/img/reactions/angry.png)
![sad](https://vidianews.com/assets/img/reactions/sad.png)
![wow](https://vidianews.com/assets/img/reactions/wow.png)